Is it possible to sue a supplier for breach after they stopped delivering under a long-term agreement?

United Statesで
最終更新日: Nov 23, 2025
Two months into a long-term supply agreement, the supplier stopped delivering. They claim force majeure, but I question whether it applies. What damages could I recover, and should I pursue arbitration or a courtroom suit to resolve this?

弁護士の回答

mohammad mehdi ghanbari

mohammad mehdi ghanbari

Nov 27, 2025
Breach of Contract Claim Viability: Yes, it is possible to sue a supplier for breach after they stopped delivering under a long-term agreement. When a supplier completely stops supplying agreed stock two months into a long-term contract, this typically constitutes a material or repudiatory breach.

Force Majeure Defense: The supplier's force majeure claim requires careful scrutiny. For this defense to succeed, they must prove: The contract contains a specific force majeure clause; The event was beyond their control and not due to negligence; The event was unforeseeable when the contract was formed. Courts enforce force majeure clauses strictly according to their plain language, and the specific events that excuse performance must typically be listed in the contract.

Recoverable Damages: Potential damages include compensatory damages for actual losses suffered, which may cover direct costs and potentially lost profits, depending on contract terms and jurisdiction. However, many contracts contain limitation of liability clauses that may restrict recoverable damages.

Arbitration vs. Litigation: The choice depends on what the contract specifies - many supply agreements include mandatory arbitration clauses. Arbitration awards may be more widely enforceable internationally than court judgments.
無料で質問する

無料 • 匿名 • 専門弁護士

個別の法的サポートが必要ですか?

お近くの経験豊富な弁護士に相談して、お客様の状況に応じたアドバイスを受けましょう。

依頼義務なし。100%無料サービス。

関連する法律専門家

この分野を専門とする弁護士から個別のサポートを受けましょう

2020年から
100名の弁護士
銀行・金融 ビジネス 企業・商取引 +1件
15名の弁護士
移民 企業・商取引 知的財産 +1件

すべての弁護士は、実績のある認定された有資格の専門家です