Fake Hit and Run Case

This case concerns a traffic accident that occurred in the Kingdom of Bahrain, in which an innocent motorcyclist (the boy) was injured and later falsely accused through misuse of legal process.
Facts of the Incident
1. On the date of the incident (21st Jan 2026), the victim (the boy), a non-Arabic-speaking expatriate, was lawfully riding his motorcycle on a public road in Bahrain.
2. A car driven by a woman (the respondent) collided with the motorcycle.
The impact caused serious damage to the motorcycle, rendering it unusable.
The boy sustained physical injuries and was visibly shaken.
3. Immediately after the accident:
The respondent voluntarily provided her driving licence, showing both the front and back.
She requested that the police not be called, stating that the matter could be resolved without official reporting.
She allowed photographs to be taken of:
Her vehicle
The accident scene
Her driving licence
Notably, despite local cultural norms where women typically wear hijab and avoid showing their face to strangers, the respondent removed her hijab and allowed her face to be photographed, indicating consent and cooperation at the scene.
4. At this stage, the boy relied on the respondent’s representations and believed the matter would be resolved fairly.
Sudden Change in Conduct
5. Shortly thereafter, the respondent made a phone call to an unknown person.
6. Following this call, her behavior changed abruptly:
She refused to accompany the boy to the police station
She declined to report the accident
She left the scene, despite knowing the boy was injured and his motorcycle was severely damaged
7. The boy, being injured, confused, and unfamiliar with local legal procedures, was left in a state of shock and distress.
False Allegation and Abuse of Process
8. On the following day, the boy reported the accident to the Traffic Police Station at Nabi Saleh, seeking lawful resolution.
9. To his shock, he was informed that the respondent had already filed a false hit-and-run complaint against him, alleging that he fled the scene of the accident.
10. This allegation is entirely false, as:
The boy remained at the scene
The respondent voluntarily provided her licence and allowed photographs
It was the respondent who left the scene without reporting the accident
Vulnerability of the Victim
11. The boy:
Does not speak Arabic
Was injured and emotionally distressed
Was nervous and unable to effectively communicate with police officers
Was therefore at a significant disadvantage
12. The respondent exploited:
Her ability to communicate in Arabic
Her familiarity with local systems
Her social position as a woman
to misrepresent facts and shift blame onto the injured victim.
Conclusion
13. The respondent’s actions demonstrate:
Bad faith
Misrepresentation of facts
Abuse of legal procedures
An attempt to evade responsibility for a traffic accident
14. The false hit-and-run allegation has caused the boy:
Legal distress
Emotional trauma
Financial loss
Further injury to his dignity and reputation
15. This case respectfully requests that:
The false complaint be dismissed
The true facts of the accident be investigated
Evidence including photographs and licence details be considered
Justice be served without prejudice based on gender, language, or social standing

16. At the time of the incident, the boy was employed as a delivery rider with [company removed], and his motorcycle was essential for performing his job duties.
17. As a direct consequence of:
The destruction of his motorcycle in the accident, and
The false hit-and-run complaint filed against him,
the boy was unable to continue his employment and subsequently lost his job.
18. The loss of employment caused:
Immediate loss of income
Severe financial hardship
Additional emotional stress, particularly given that he was already injured and facing legal uncertainty in a foreign country.
19. This loss of livelihood was not due to any fault or negligence on the part of the boy, but arose directly from the respondent’s actions and misrepresentation of facts.

Conclusion (renumbered accordingly)
20. The respondent’s conduct amounts to:
Bad faith
False reporting
Abuse of legal process
Exploitation of the victim’s vulnerable position
21. The cumulative impact on the boy includes:
Physical injury
Damage to property
Legal distress
Emotional trauma
Loss of employment and income
22. The boy respectfully seeks that the authorities take these factors into consideration while evaluating the facts and determining responsibility.

Fake Hit and run case number :4321 2026