You need more information?
Let us find the right lawyers for you
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2024
Dispute Resolution for B2B Transactions in Thailand: A Detailed Overview
Dispute resolution is a critical component of business-to-business interactions. Thailand's legal structure allows for a variety of conflict resolution options, including litigation, arbitration, and mediation. Understanding these procedures is critical for attorneys and law firms advising businesses on commercial activity. This article gives an in-depth look at dispute resolution for B2B transactions in Thailand, including the legal environment, major processes, and practical issues.
The main legal instrument controlling commercial transactions and conflict resolution is the Thai Civil and Commercial Code (CCC). It specifies in commercial contracts the rights and obligations of the parties, including with clauses covering breach of contract and remedies.
Thailand's legal system for controlling civil and business transactions is built mostly on the CCC. Adopted in 1925, the CCC offers a whole body of legislation controlling responsibilities, contracts, property rights, family relations, and inheritance.
Knowing the CCC's clauses on contracts, obligations, and remedies for breach of contract is crucial for attorneys and law firms engaged in business to business transactions.
This section delves into the relevant aspects of the CCC for B2B dispute resolution:
The CCC is divided into several books, each addressing different areas of civil and commercial law:
Several specific provisions of the CCC are particularly relevant to B2B transactions:
The CCC provides various remedies for breach of contract, aimed at protecting the non-breaching party and ensuring justice. These remedies include:
When advising clients on B2B transactions and potential disputes under the CCC, lawyers should consider the following:
The Civil Procedure Code (CPC) establishes the rules for litigation in Thai courts. It includes lawsuit filing, court processes, evidentiary standards, and judgment enforcement.
The Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002) governs arbitration in Thailand. It establishes a complete framework for both local and international arbitration, including the recognition and execution of arbitration rulings.
The Mediation Act, B.E. 2562 (2019), encourages mediation as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) strategy. It defines rules for the mediation process and the role of mediators.
The Thai judicial system has multiple tiers, including:
- Courts of First Instance: These are provincial and district courts that hear civil and commercial cases.
- The Court of Appeal reviews decisions made by the Courts of First Instance.
- Supreme Court: The highest court that hears rulings from the Court of Appeals.
To start a case, the plaintiff must submit a complaint with the proper Court of First Instance. The complaint must contain:
- The names and addresses of all parties
- A declaration of fact
- The relief sought
After filing the complaint, the court will issue a summons to the defendant, who must answer within a given time frame. The court may schedule preliminary hearings to resolve procedural concerns and decide whether the matter should go to trial.
Thai courts adopt an inquisitorial system, in which judges actively investigate the facts. Parties must provide evidence, such as papers, witness testimony, and expert opinions. The court may also order site inspections or appoint experts.
The court will issue a judgment following the conclusion of the trial. Parties that are unsatisfied with the verdict may file an appeal with the Court of Appeal and, if necessary, the Supreme Court. Appeals must be supported by legal grounds, such as mistakes in law or practice.
Enforcing a ruling in Thailand entails numerous steps:
- Request for Execution: The prevailing party must submit a request with the court to have the judgment executed.
- Writ of execution: The court issues a writ of execution, which authorizes enforcement measures.
- Enforcement Actions: These may involve bank account garnishments, asset seizures, and property auctions.
Arbitration is a preferred alternative to litigation for settling business-to-business issues in Thailand. It provides a private, flexible, and fast process, and parties frequently choose arbitration due to its secrecy and experience.
Parties must have an arbitration agreement, which might be a condition in their contract or a separate agreement. The agreement should state:
- The range of conflicts covered
- The number of arbiters
- Arbitration rules
- The place of arbitration
Thailand has signed the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This makes foreign arbitral awards enforceable in Thailand. To enforce an award, the prevailing party needs to:
Mediation is an increasingly popular ADR method in Thailand, providing a collaborative approach to dispute resolution. An impartial mediator assists discussions between parties in order to obtain a mutually agreeable agreement.
- Cost-effective: Mediation is typically less expensive than litigation or arbitration.
- Time-saving: Mediation can help resolve issues more swiftly.
- Confidentiality: Mediation procedures are kept secret and confidential.
- Relationship Preservation: Mediation promotes collaboration and can assist to keep corporate ties intact.
Lawyers should carefully construct dispute resolution sections in business contracts, taking into consideration:
- Choice of Forum: Indicate whether disagreements will be settled by lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation.
- Governing Legislation: Determine the relevant legislation for settling conflicts.
- Arbitration Details: Include information such as the number of arbitrators, arbitration rules, and the location of the arbitration.
- Mediation Process: Explain how the mediation process works, including mediator selection and timetables.
Lawyers should advise clients on the benefits and drawbacks of any conflict settlement process, taking criteria such as:
- The nature of the Dispute: Some disagreements may require litigation, while others may benefit from arbitration or mediation.
- Cost and Time: Compare the costs and time requirements of each option.
- Confidentiality: Determine the value of privacy to the client.
- Enforceability: Consider how easy it is to enforce judgments or awards in Thailand and overseas.
Effective planning is critical to successful conflict settlement. Lawyers should consider the following:
- Gather Evidence: Gather and arrange any pertinent documents, witness testimony, and expert views.
- Develop a Plan: Create a clear plan that includes essential arguments and potential counterarguments.
- Client Communication: Keep clients informed about the process and manage their expectations.
A Thai manufacturing company signed a deal with a foreign supplier for the raw material delivery. The company suffered large losses when the supplier fell short of expectations on time. Pursuing damages for contract violation, the manufacturer sued in a Thai court. The court decided in the company's favor, assigning damages and mandating payment of legal expenses by the supplier. The supplier appealed; the Court of Appeal maintained the lower court's decision.
Two multinational companies—one based in Thailand and the other in Japan—had an arbitration clause in their electronics sales contract. There was a dispute about the quality of the goods that were delivered. Arbitration between the parties started that conformed with Thai Arbitration Institute principles. The Thai company won before the arbitral panel, which also granted damages and expenses. The Japanese corporation cooperated with the award, and the matter was ended without going to court.
A Thai IT business and a foreign client disagreed over a software development project. The parties agreed to mediate and chose a mediator with experience in IT problems. Following multiple mediation meetings, they reached an agreement on a revised project timeframe and compensation for delays. The deal protected their business connection while avoiding the need for litigation.
- Complexity: Dispute resolution processes can be complicated, necessitating knowledge of procedural norms and substantive law.
- Cultural Differences: Cross-border disputes can be complicated by cultural differences.
- Enforcement: Enforcing judgments and awards, particularly in foreign countries, can be difficult.
- Increased Use of ADR: There is a rising trend of employing ADR procedures, such as mediation and arbitration, to settle commercial conflicts.
- Digital Dispute Resolution: The usage of technology, such as online dispute resolution platforms, is expected to grow, resulting in more efficient and accessible solutions.
- Legal Changes: Thailand's ongoing legal changes seek to expedite conflict settlement procedures and encourage alternative dispute resolution techniques (ADR).
With many choices for addressing problems, dispute resolution is a crucial element of business to business interactions in Thailand. Lawyers and law firms who counsel businesses must first understand the legal framework and processes for mediation, arbitration, and litigation.
Through well crafted dispute resolution agreements, client education on best practices, and sufficient preparation, lawyers may help their clients effectively negotiate disagreements. As the landscape constantly changes, remaining current on difficulties and future trends will be critical for giving effective legal advice.
---
Lawyers and law firms can better serve their clients by adhering to these standards and exploiting the information provided here.
If you have any questions, why not connect with some of the mediation & arbitration lawyers in Thailand, who you can contact through the Lawzana platform.
Let us find the right lawyers for you