弁護士の回答
Judicial Advocacy Law Firm
Article 213 of the Family Code states that: “In case of separation of the parents, parental authority shall be exercised by the parent designated by the Court. The Court shall take into account all relevant considerations, especially the choice of the child over seven years of age, unless the parent chosen is unfit.”
This means that a child under 7 years of age are under the parental authority of their mothers may they be legitimate or illegitimate, meaning the child shall not be separated from the mother, unless the court finds compelling reasons to order otherwise. Some of the compelling reasons which would justify an exception to the rule and not awarding custody to the mother are neglect, abandonment, unemployment and immorality, habitual drunkenness, drug addiction, maltreatment of the child, insanity or affliction with a communicable illness (Tonog vs Court of Appeals, GR 122906, 7 February 2002).
If the child is at an age where he or she can make intelligent choices, his or her preferences and best interests can trump procedural rules. The family code states that the father of the illegitimate child may have parental authority over the child, including legal custody and visitatorial rights considering that the father of the illegitimate child has inherent and natural rights over the child which he can assert to uphold his rights as a father over his illegitimate child and achievie full custody or visitatorial right.
無料 • 匿名 • 専門弁護士
個別の法的サポートが必要ですか?
お近くの経験豊富な弁護士に相談して、お客様の状況に応じたアドバイスを受けましょう。
依頼義務なし。100%無料サービス。
関連する法律専門家
この分野を専門とする弁護士から個別のサポートを受けましょう
すべての弁護士は、実績のある認定された有資格の専門家です