AVA Legal slf | Litigation, Legal Counseling & Case Management in Iceland
At AVA Legal slf, we provide practical, reliable, and client-focused legal services to individuals and businesses in Iceland. Our firm is built on the belief that legal guidance should be clear, accessible, and tailored to each client’s unique situation. By combining strong legal expertise with a transparent and straightforward approach, we help our clients navigate legal challenges with confidence.
We offer comprehensive legal support across several key areas, including legal counseling, litigation, legal case management, and the preparation of legal documents. Through both in-person and online consultations, we provide clients with professional legal advice on their rights, obligations, and available options, ensuring they can make informed decisions from the very beginning.
Litigation is one of our primary areas of practice. We represent clients in civil and criminal cases before Icelandic district courts, managing every stage of the legal process—from filing a claim to negotiations, settlements, or final judgment. Our goal is to protect our clients’ interests while pursuing effective and practical outcomes.
In addition to litigation, we assist clients with case management and the preparation of essential legal documents, including contracts, wills, and settlements. We place strong emphasis on accuracy, clarity, and efficiency, ensuring that every document is prepared with precision while providing the necessary legal guidance throughout the process.
At AVA Legal slf, we prioritize transparency, organization, and open communication. We believe that clients should always understand the status of their legal matters and the steps ahead. Our commitment is not only to resolve legal issues but also to provide the clarity, support, and trusted legal guidance our clients need to move forward with confidence.
Firm Information
Our Office
Contact our office for legal assistance.
Reykjavik
Iceland
Lágmúli 7, 5th floor, 108 Reykjavík
Languages
Practice Areas
Accidents & Injuries
Car Accident
Construction Accident
+50 more
Case Results
Successful outcomes we've achieved for our clients
District court of Reykjavík Case nr. E-4513/2025
Work Injury
District court of Reykjavík Case nr. E-4513/2025
Work Injury
The District Court of Reykjavík upheld the claims of AVA Legal’s client in a judgment delivered on 18 December 2025 in case no. E-4513/2025. The defendant was ordered to pay the firm’s client damages in the amount of ISK 38,233,436 plus interests.
The case concerned the settlement of compensation following personal injury sustained by the client in the course of employment in 2015 due to an occupational disease. The principal issues in dispute was whether a final settlement had been reached before between the parties and how the claims should be calculated in light of the firm's clients tax returns not showing his full salary previous years in regards to compensation for permanent disability. Additionally there was a dispute on what interests the claims should accrue.
The Court accepted our firms client's position that no final settlement had taken place and that the conditions were met to depart from the main rule of the Tort Compensation Act when assessing future earning capacity. It was held that the earnings of certified carpenters constituted the appropriate benchmark for the client’s future income.
The firm celebrates the result and acknowledges that the result can have importance for future tort cases regarding full compensation for damages after occupational diseases. The case furthermore confirms the importance of assessing an injured party’s earning capacity holistically where unusual circumstances have existed during the reference period.
Supreme court of Iceland decision nr. 157/2025
Work Injury
Supreme court of Iceland decision nr. 157/2025
Work Injury
The Supreme Court of Iceland has granted AVA Legal’s clients application to appeal to the court the decision of the Appallette Court of Iceland delivered on 22 December 2025.
The case is regards the claim of parents who lost their son whilst he was working at sea. In the lower courts, the defendants were acquitted; however, AVA Legal’s clients argued that significant procedural defects had occurred in the proceedings before the Court of Appeal (Landsréttur) and that the judgment was incorrect both procedurally and substantively The Supreme Court accepted that there may have been defects in the proceedings before the Court of Appeal so as to justify granting leave to appeal, and therefore approved the clients’ application.
AVA Legal is pleased with the result of the Supreme Court and considers it an important step toward a substantive review of a case concerning liability for a fatal accidents at sea and the evidentiary position of next of kin in such matters.
District court of Reykjavík Case nr. E-6359/2023
Bankruptcy
District court of Reykjavík Case nr. E-6359/2023
Bankruptcy
The District Court of Reykjavík upheld the claims of AVA Legal’s client in a judgment delivered on 30 December 2025 in case no. E-6359/2023, ordering the defendant to pay ISK 14,021,409 plus penalty interests and legal costs. The case concerned whether funds provided by the estate and used for the defendant’s real estate purchase constituted a loan or a gift on behalf of the bankrupt individual. The Court held that the burden of proving a gift rested with the defendant and found that this burden had not been met. On the contrary, the evidence and communications between the parties indicated that the funds were a loan subject to repayment. The Court also rejected the defendant’s arguments for a reduction of the claim, including alleged unpaid rental bills and damages, due to them being either unproven and/or fabrication. AVA Legal represented the estate in the case.
District court of Reykjavík case nr. 665/2025
Drug Crime
District court of Reykjavík case nr. 665/2025
Drug Crime
The District Court of Reykjavík delivered a judgement on 4 December 2025 in case no. S-665/2025, in which AVA Legal’s client was charged with a major narcotics offence, violations of customs and pharmaceutical laws, and an offence against public authority. The state demanded punishment of up to 8 years in prison. It was undisputed that the defendant had imported a significant quantity of medicinal products into the country; however, the principal issue in dispute was whether the importation had been intended for distribution and profit. The Court found that it had not been proven that the products were intended for sale and distribution and took into account the health of the accused. It concluded that the defendant was not guilty of a major narcotics offence or importation for distribution purposes. The defendant was, however, convicted of unlawful importation of the substances and of an offence against public authority arising from an incident during customs control searching of his property. In determining the sentence, the Court had regard, inter alia, to psychiatric findings and the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offence and considered an appropriate penalty to be three months’ imprisonment, suspended.