Barristers Bureau of Oleh Oliinyk

Successful cases
1. Ensured that the court of first instance issued a decision to cancel the decisions of the STI on the addition of more than 5 million UAH. (about 1 million US dollars at the current exchange rate. The decision of the Commercial Court of Zaporozhye region in the USSR is not included.
2. Ensured the issuance of court decisions by the courts of first, appellate and cassation instance on the cancellation of tax notices-decisions of Obukhiv STI in the total amount of UAH 6.2 million. The balance of the amount of surcharges in the amount of 244 thousand UAH. (“Conditional interest”) was written off later, due to the STI missing the deadline for consideration of the complaint.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/24368170.
3. Out of court, the STA body revoked the tax notice-decision of the Shevchenkivsky STI on the addition of UAH 1.07 million; proved the absence of a crime in the actions of the director and ensured the closure of the criminal case on this fact.
Decision of the Ministry of Revenue dated 25.09.2013 №11874 / 6 / 99-99-10-01-15; Resolution of the State Tax Inspectorate of the State Tax Inspectorate in the Shevchenkivskyi district of the State Revenue Service in Kyiv of October 30, 2013, Crimea. proceedings №32013110100000162
4. Ensured the cancellation by the court of the tax notice-decision to refuse to reimburse VAT in the amount of 103 thousand UAH.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/24738846
5. Ensured the issuance of court decisions of the court of first instance in the amount of 1.2 million UAH. and court decisions of the court of cassation in the total amount of 6.7 million on the return of overpaid customs duties. All decisions are made.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/30404844; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/33283456; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/35361103; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/37629849; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/40035440; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/52078428
6. Ensured the abolition of administrative and judicial tax notices-decisions in the amount of 412 thousand UAH., Recovery from the STI court costs in the amount of 22 thousand UAH. Accompanied the case in the court of first, appellate, cassation instance. Achieved a change of jurisdiction during the hostilities in Donetsk in the summer of 2014 (with legal uncertainty on this issue).
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/53732414; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/63322506; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/60197541.
7. Ensured the issuance of court decisions by the courts of first and cassation, the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the cancellation of tax notices-decisions in the amount of UAH 11.7 million. He accompanied the case in the court of cassation and the Supreme Court of Ukraine.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/42610281; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/54436448
8. Ensured the cancellation of the Supreme Administrative Court's decision of the NBU to change the term of settlement in foreign currency (not reviewed by the Supreme Court). As a result, he ensured the abolition by the courts of the penalty accrued by the Obukhiv STI for overdue term in the amount of UAH 807,000.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/53365636; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/53941248
9. Ensured the cancellation by the Supreme Court of Ukraine of the decision of the Court of Cassation on the cancellation of court decisions on the return of UAH 1.07 million. overpaid customs duties (protected the interests of the client for this amount)
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/53537472
10. Ensured the cancellation of the decision of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv on the seizure of documents in criminal proceedings (Article 212 of the Criminal Code) with the issuance of a new decision prohibiting such seizure.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/54754738
11. Ensured the revocation of the decision of the Solomyansky District Court of Kyiv on the seizure of documents in criminal proceedings (Article 212 of the Criminal Code) with the issuance of a new decision prohibiting such seizure. Subsequently, the criminal proceedings were closed on rehabilitative grounds.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/59017950
12. Ensured that the Supreme Court of Ukraine upheld the decisions of lower courts on the cancellation of tax notices-decisions in the amount of UAH 4.3 million.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/66413429
13. Ensured that the Court of Cassation upheld the decisions of lower courts on the cancellation of tax notices-decisions in the amount of UAH 0.4 million.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/69466295
14. Ensured the decision of the Court of Cassation to revoke the SDPI order on the appointment of a tax audit (became one of the grounds for closing the criminal proceedings against the client).
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/64434960
15. Took decisive part in the appeal of tax notices-decisions in the administrative order under the act of 16.08.2016. As a result, the SFS Runway Office reduced the surcharge by UAH 1 million; The SFS reduced the surcharge by more than UAH 30 million.
SFS decision of 16.01.2017 №628 / 6 / 99-99-11-01-02-25

16. Protected the interests of the taxpayer during the review of the case by the Supreme Court of Ukraine in an administrative case on the recognition of illegal and cancellation of tax notices-decisions in the amount of 5 300 thousand UAH. Despite the current unfavorable for taxpayers legal position of the Supreme Court and the presence among the reviewed court decisions of the decision to completely dismiss the taxpayer's claim, achieved only partial satisfaction of the STI complaint and referral to a court of appeal.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/67900171
17. Received operational access to the materials of the criminal proceedings under Part 3 of Art. 212 of the Criminal Code, provided support for the partial and subsequent complete cancellation of the arrest imposed on the accounts of the taxpayer at the request of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78817615; http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80974329
18. During the trial the court essentially ensured the removal of the arrest and withdrawal of funds from the taxpayer's account, as well as the return of the indictment to the prosecutor
in criminal proceedings under Part 3 of Art. 212 of the Criminal Code
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82156493
19. Received prompt access to the materials of the criminal proceedings under Part 3 of Art. 212 of the Criminal Code, provided complete cancellation of the arrest imposed on the payer's accounts
taxes at the request of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine, withdrawal of funds from accounts
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81012584
20. Protected the interests of the taxpayer in an administrative case on a claim to the State Tax Service for the cancellation of tax notices-decisions in the amount of 127 thousand UAH.
The claim was satisfied, the PPR was canceled.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84128104
21. Protected the interests of the taxpayer in an administrative case on a lawsuit against the State Tax Service for the obligation to register a tax invoice in the amount of 127 thousand UAH.
The claim is satisfied, the tax invoice is registered.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/83292908
22. Protected the interests of the taxpayer during a new trial by the court of first instance in an administrative case on the recognition of illegal and cancellation of tax notices-decisions in the amount of 5 300 thousand UAH. The claim was satisfied in full, the PPR was canceled, court costs were collected from the STI.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82347262
23. Protected the interests of the taxpayer in an administrative case on a claim to the State Tax Service for the abolition of tax notices-decisions in the amount of 76 thousand UAH.
The claim was satisfied, PPR was canceled, court costs in the amount of UAH 26,000 were collected from the STI.
Links to decisions in the USSR http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80230861
25. Analyzed the documents of the official bodies of the Spanish Republic and submitted to the State Tax Service in Kyiv an application for writing off the debt of a person due to his death.
The application was satisfied, the debt was written off without taking measures to identify the debtor's heirs (the client was not given permission to disclose information).