Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Antitrust law in Greece seeks to preserve fair competition in the market and protect consumers from anti competitive practices. The national framework works with EU competition rules to address cartels, abuses of dominance and unlawful mergers. In Nea Erythraia, as in the rest of Greece, investigations are led primarily by the Hellenic Competition Commission and, where relevant, by EU institutions for cross border matters.
Greece enforces competition rules mainly through administrative decisions and remedies rather than criminal penalties. Local businesses and individuals can file complaints or participate in merger notifications when applicable. Practicing law in this field requires precise factual gathering, legal analysis, and adherence to procedural timelines set by the national authority and EU law.
Understanding both national and EU competition standards helps residents of Nea Erythraia determine when antitrust issues require legal counsel. A qualified attorney can translate complex rules into practical steps, whether you are a small business, a consumer, or a larger company operating in the Athens metropolitan area.
European competition policy harmonizes national competition rules with EU law to address cross border effects in Greece. See European Commission competition policy for context.
The Hellenic Competition Commission applies Greek law that implements EU rules on cartels, abuses of dominance and mergers, including in the Athens region and its suburbs such as Nea Erythraia.
Law 3959/2011 on the Organization and Operation of the Hellenic Competition Commission governs national competition enforcement, including investigations, decisions and remedies. It forms the core national framework by which antitrust issues are processed in Greece, including Nea Erythraia. Effective since 2011, the law aligns Greek procedures with EU competition standards.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Articles 101 and 102 address anti competitive agreements and abuses of dominance at the EU level. These provisions apply in Greece and are enforceable by EU and national authorities. The Lisbon Treaty and subsequent changes reinforced these rules across member states, including Greece since 2009.
Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 on the implementation of the rules on competition by national authorities sets the procedural framework for investigations, dawn raids and evidence gathering. It entered into force on 1 May 2004 and governs how Greek authorities apply EU competition rules, including in Nea Erythraia.
Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EU Merger Regulation) establishes thresholds and procedures for evaluating mergers and acquisitions. It became effective in 2004 and works together with Law 3959/2011 in national and cross border cases affecting Nea Erythraia firms.
In practice, Greek courts and the Hellenic Competition Commission apply these laws to cases arising in Nea Erythraia, including matters involving local retail, services, construction, and digital markets. You should engage a lawyer who understands both Greek procedural rules and EU competition law to navigate complex investigations or filings.
Antitrust law in Greece prohibits cartels, abuses of dominance, and anti competitive mergers. It combines Greek statute Law 3959/2011 with EU competition rules found in the TFEU.
Submit a detailed statement with facts, documents, and any supporting evidence to the Commission. A lawyer can help structure the complaint to maximize clarity and legal relevance.
While not required, hiring a lawyer improves analysis, evidence gathering, and communication with authorities. An attorney can protect your rights and advise on remedies.
Investigation timelines vary by case complexity. Simple matters may take months, while complex cartel inquiries can stretch over a year or more.
Abuse of dominance occurs when a firm with market power engages in behavior that unfairly restricts competition or harms consumers. This includes predatory pricing and discriminatory conduct.
Yes. A private right of action may exist for damages caused by anti competitive practices, potentially alongside authority enforcement.
Fines depend on the gravity and duration of the violation, turnover, and other factors. The Hellenic Competition Commission sets penalties, which may be substantial.
Large scale mergers may require notification under EU and national rules. A lawyer can assess thresholds and prepare the filing if needed.
Price fixing is a form of collusion where rivals agree on prices. Collusion can also involve market sharing, output restrictions, or bid rigging.
Yes. EU rules apply when the conduct has cross border effects or involves EU markets, or when Greek authorities enforce EU competition law under Regulation 1/2003.
Antitrust enforcement in Greece is primarily administrative and civil, with the possibility of fines and injunctions rather than criminal sanctions in most cases.
