Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Antitrust law, also called competition law, is the body of rules that prevents companies from engaging in practices that unfairly restrict competition. In Viby, Denmark, the same national and EU competition rules apply as elsewhere in Denmark. Enforcement is carried out by national authorities and courts, and EU institutions play a role when conduct affects trade between EU member states.
For businesses and individuals in Viby - whether small local firms or branches of larger companies - antitrust rules cover areas such as price-fixing, market-sharing, abuse of dominance, restrictive distribution agreements, and certain merger transactions. Violations can lead to administrative fines, civil claims for damages, and orders to stop anti-competitive conduct. The rules are designed to protect consumers, other businesses, and the competitive process.
You may need a lawyer if you face any of the following situations:
- An investigation or dawn raid by the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority.
- Allegations from a competitor or customer about price-fixing, market allocation, resale price maintenance, or exclusionary conduct.
- Plans to merge with or acquire another company where merger control rules may apply.
- Receipt of a complaint that could lead to civil litigation for damages or injunctive relief.
- Need to design or review commercial agreements so they comply with competition law.
Specialist competition lawyers help you understand the legal risks, prepare submissions to authorities, negotiate settlements, apply for leniency or immunity if applicable, represent you in court, and design compliance programs to reduce future risk. Early legal advice can prevent costly mistakes and preserve defenses such as legal privilege where appropriate.
Key legal features relevant to Viby include both Danish national law and EU competition law:
- Prohibited conduct: Agreements that restrict competition, collusion on prices or markets, abuse of dominant position, and certain concerted practices are prohibited under the Danish Competition Act and Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
- Merger control: Significant mergers that meet national or EU thresholds may require notification and approval before closing. Transactions that affect competition in Denmark may be reviewed by the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority and, where thresholds are met, by the European Commission.
- Enforcement authorities: The Danish Competition and Consumer Authority is the primary national enforcer. Administrative decisions can be appealed to the Competition Appeals Tribunal. For private claims, courts such as Retten i Aarhus and appeals courts handle civil litigation.
- Sanctions and remedies: The authority can impose administrative fines, order cessation of prohibited conduct, and require remedies. Private parties can seek damages and injunctive relief through the courts. Leniency programs and settlement procedures can reduce penalties where a party cooperates.
- Interaction with other areas: Public procurement law, sector regulation, and consumer protection rules may intersect with competition issues. Agreements that look benign in isolation can raise competition concerns when viewed in context.
- Procedural protections: Companies and individuals have rights during investigations, but those rights differ from criminal settings. Legal privilege attaches to confidential communications with a lawyer, which is important to preserve when seeking advice.
Antitrust violations typically include price-fixing, market or customer allocation, bid-rigging, output restrictions, and concerted practices that restrict competition. Abuse of a dominant position - for example charging unfairly high prices or using exclusionary tactics - is also prohibited. Whether a specific practice is unlawful depends on its object and effects in the relevant market, taking into account national and EU law.
The authority may start a formal investigation after receiving a complaint or through market monitoring. It can conduct dawn raids at business premises with a warrant. You may be contacted for information or receive a formal decision. If you suspect an investigation is imminent, consult a competition lawyer immediately to preserve privilege and prepare a response.
Remain calm and cooperate within the legal framework. Ask to see the warrant and note what it authorizes. Contact legal counsel without delay and try to avoid obstructing the search. Your lawyer can advise on privilege, what documents can be handed over, and how to document the search. Do not delete or alter any data or documents, as that can lead to further sanctions.
In Denmark, both companies and responsible individuals may face consequences. Administrative fines are typically levied on companies, but individuals can be fined in specific circumstances and may also face civil liability. In practice, enforcement often targets corporate liability, but personal liability risks should not be ignored, especially for managers who orchestrate illegal conduct.
Leniency programs allow a cartel participant to report unlawful conduct to the competition authority in exchange for reduced or eliminated fines, provided they meet strict conditions such as providing full, timely and truthful cooperation. Denmark participates in national and EU leniency frameworks. Early legal advice is crucial if you consider leniency, because handling admissions and evidence requires care and speed.
Not all deals require notification. Whether a transaction must be notified depends on turnover and market impact thresholds under Danish law and the EU Merger Regulation. If your transaction meets notification thresholds, you generally must obtain approval before closing. A competition lawyer can assess thresholds, advise whether a filing is required, and prepare the notification to minimize delays and risk.
Yes. Private parties harmed by anti-competitive conduct can bring civil claims for damages before national courts such as Retten i Aarhus. Courts will assess liability, causation, and quantification of harm. Parallel administrative enforcement by the competition authority can support private claims, but litigation has its own procedural rules and evidentiary standards.
Timelines vary significantly. Administrative investigations can take months to years depending on complexity and cooperation. Merger reviews under EU rules have fixed phases and deadlines, while national reviews can be quicker or slower. Civil litigation timelines depend on the court schedule, evidence gathering, and appeals. Early strategy and active case management can reduce delays.
Common defenses include denying the existence of an agreement or concerted practice, showing the conduct falls within a block exemption or is objectively necessary, demonstrating lack of market power or harm, or proving that statements and documents alleged to evidence a cartel are ambiguous. The strength of any defense depends on the facts and market context.
Look for lawyers or firms with specific experience in competition law, both in administrative proceedings and civil litigation. Relevant experience includes handling dawn raids, leniency applications, merger filings, and private damages claims. Ask about local court experience, contacts with the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority, and track record. Discuss fees, retainer terms, and how they will communicate during the matter.
Useful bodies and organizations that can assist or provide information include:
- Danish Competition and Consumer Authority - the national authority that investigates and enforces competition rules.
- Competition Appeals Tribunal - the appeals body for administrative decisions in competition matters.
- Retten i Aarhus - the district court that handles civil litigation in the Aarhus area, including competition damages claims.
- Vestre Landsret - the regional high court for appeals from courts in western Denmark.
- European Commission - Directorate-General for Competition - for EU-level enforcement and guidance when conduct affects multiple member states.
- Danish Bar and Law Society - for lists of qualified competition law practitioners and guidance on legal professional conduct.
- Industry associations and the Chamber of Commerce - for sector-specific guidance and best practice information.
If you suspect a competition law issue or have been contacted by an authority, follow these practical steps:
- Preserve evidence: Stop any routine document deletion or data destruction related to the matter. Preserve emails, records, and electronic data that may be relevant.
- Seek immediate legal advice: Engage a competition law specialist as early as possible. Early counsel can protect privilege and shape your response.
- Assess the situation: With your lawyer, map the factual timeline, identify involved personnel, and evaluate the potential legal exposure.
- Consider proactive options: Depending on the facts, options may include voluntary notification, leniency application, settlement discussions, or defensive litigation planning.
- Prepare for practical issues: Train staff on interacting with investigators, assemble a response team, and document steps taken to comply with legal advice.
- Implement or update compliance measures: Whether or not you face immediate risk, a robust competition compliance program reduces future exposure. This includes policies, training, audits, and reporting channels.
- Choose local representation if you need court representation in Viby or Aarhus. Local counsel will be familiar with the district court procedures and local courts.
Taking prompt, informed action is the best way to manage antitrust risk. A specialist competition lawyer can guide you through each stage, protect your rights, and help achieve the best possible outcome.
