Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Antitrust litigation covers legal disputes arising from restrictions on competition, such as cartels, abuse of dominant market position, anti-competitive agreements, and unlawful concentrations. In Poland antitrust law is enforced both at the national level and at the European Union level. National enforcement is carried out mainly by the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection - the central authority that investigates suspected violations and can impose administrative remedies and fines. Competition-related private claims for damages and injunctions can be brought in the courts. For residents and businesses in Gryfice, located in the West Pomeranian region, antitrust matters follow the same legal framework as elsewhere in Poland, and may also engage EU competition rules when conduct affects cross-border trade.
Antitrust matters are complex and technical. You should consider hiring a lawyer when you face any of the following situations:
- You are under investigation by the competition authority or you have received an administrative notice, decision, or fine.
- You suspect competitors are coordinating prices, dividing markets, or rigging bids that harm your business or procurement processes.
- You believe a dominant competitor is abusing its market position through exclusionary practices, unfair pricing, tied sales, predatory pricing, or unfair trading terms.
- You need to notify or seek approval for a merger or concentration that may trigger mandatory notification thresholds.
- You plan to bring a private damages claim or seek injunctive relief after harm from anti-competitive conduct.
- You are a business considering a compliance audit, competition law training, or need help designing contract clauses that avoid antitrust risk.
- You are considering applying for leniency because your company participated in a cartel and you want to reduce or avoid fines.
Key legal features relevant to antitrust cases in Poland include the following:
- Primary statute: Polish competition law is set out in the Competition and Consumer Protection Act. That Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of a dominant position and provides the authority and enforcement powers to the competition authority.
- Administrative enforcement: The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection investigates suspected breaches, can issue decisions, impose administrative fines, and order remedies. The authority may also impose interim measures in urgent situations to prevent ongoing damage to competition.
- Criminal and administrative sanctions: Most enforcement in Poland is administrative, not criminal. Administrative fines can be substantial and are often calculated with reference to turnover. Other corrective measures may include cease-and-desist orders and behavioral or structural remedies.
- Merger control: Certain concentrations require notification to and approval from the competition authority when turnover thresholds are met. Notifying parties must supply detailed information about the transaction and market impact.
- Private enforcement: Individuals and businesses harmed by anti-competitive conduct can seek damages and injunctions in civil courts. Decisions of the competition authority can be used as evidence in follow-on civil claims, and separate stand-alone claims are also possible.
- EU law interaction: EU competition law applies where conduct may affect trade between EU Member States. The European Commission has exclusive competence for some cross-border cases, while national authorities enforce national law and apply EU rules as appropriate.
- Procedural rights: Parties subject to proceedings have rights to be heard, to present evidence, and to appeal administrative decisions to specialized courts. There are statutory timeframes and procedural requirements for filing appeals and bringing civil claims.
Unlawful conduct typically includes price-fixing, market allocation, bid-rigging, production or sales restrictions, exchanging competitively sensitive information, and abuse of a dominant market position that excludes competitors or exploits customers. Whether conduct is unlawful depends on the specific facts, market structure, and applicable statutory or EU rules.
The primary national enforcer is the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection. For matters affecting trade between EU Member States, the European Commission may have jurisdiction. Private parties may also bring claims in civil courts to seek damages or injunctions.
You can file a complaint with the national competition authority. Complaints should include as much factual detail and documentary evidence as possible, such as dates, participants, communications, and invoices. A lawyer can help prepare the complaint and advise on protection of confidential information.
A leniency program lets a participant in a cartel apply for full or partial immunity from fines if it provides evidence that helps the authority uncover the cartel. There are strict procedural rules and timing requirements. Legal counsel experienced in leniency applications is essential to preserve eligibility and negotiate cooperating conditions.
Yes. Enforcement generally focuses on the conduct and effect on competition rather than company size. Small businesses may face investigations if they participate in anti-competitive agreements or practices. However, penalties and remedies take account of the scale and impact of the conduct.
Remedies may include injunctive relief to stop anti-competitive conduct, damages for loss suffered, reimbursement of costs, and in some cases orders requiring structural or behavioral remedies. Administrative authorities can impose fines and corrective measures in administrative proceedings.
Timelines vary widely. Administrative investigations can take months to years, depending on complexity. Court proceedings for private claims or appeals can also be lengthy. Early legal advice helps manage timing and identify opportunities for interim relief.
Yes. A decision by the competition authority that finds anti-competitive conduct can be powerful evidence in follow-on damages claims. Courts will still examine causation and quantum of damages, but an administrative finding can shorten or simplify proof of the infringement.
Refuse to participate in any agreement that limits competition. Keep a written record of the approach and report the conduct to legal counsel and, if appropriate, to the competition authority. Participating even briefly in a cartel can expose your business to serious penalties.
Costs depend on complexity, the lawyer or firm chosen, and the fee arrangement. Common fee structures include hourly rates, fixed fees for defined tasks, and success-linked fees for certain civil claims. Ask prospective lawyers for a clear engagement agreement that explains fees, likely expenses, and milestones.
When dealing with antitrust issues in Gryfice you can turn to national and international resources for guidance and support. Useful bodies and organizations include:
- The national competition authority, which handles investigations, complaints, and provides guidance on compliance.
- Specialized courts and judicial bodies that hear appeals and civil claims related to competition law.
- The European Commission and EU institutions for matters with cross-border or EU law implications.
- Professional legal associations and local bar or advocacy chambers where you can find qualified competition lawyers and check credentials.
- Business associations, chambers of commerce, and industry bodies that may offer compliance guidance and training.
- Consumer protection groups and NGOs that represent collective interests and may bring representative actions in competition-related consumer matters.
If you believe you need legal assistance with an antitrust matter in Gryfice consider the following practical steps:
- Collect and preserve relevant documents and records. Save emails, contracts, invoices, meeting notes, and any other material that may relate to the issue.
- Avoid actions that could worsen your position - for example, do not destroy evidence or continue potentially unlawful conduct.
- Seek a consultation with a lawyer who has experience in Polish and EU competition law. Prepare a factual summary and the key documents for the meeting.
- Ask the lawyer about likely outcomes, timelines, fees, and the best strategy - whether to negotiate, cooperate with authority, apply for leniency, or initiate civil proceedings.
- If you decide to file a complaint or seek remedies, follow procedural requirements and deadlines carefully, and work with counsel to protect confidential business information.
- If you are a business, consider implementing or updating a competition compliance program and staff training to reduce future risk.
Getting timely legal advice will help you understand rights and obligations, limit exposure, and pursue the most effective path to resolve an antitrust dispute.
