Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Antitrust litigation covers legal disputes that arise from competition law - for example alleged cartels, abuse of a dominant position, anti-competitive agreements and merger-related restrictions. In Sweden competition law is shaped by both national rules and European Union law. The Swedish Competition Act - Konkurrenslagen (2008:579) - implements many EU principles and is applied together with Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Enforcement and litigation take place at different levels: administrative investigations and enforcement actions are handled by the Swedish Competition Authority - Konkurrensverket - while complex litigation and claims for injunctions or damages are typically brought in the courts. Major competition cases and appeals are concentrated in specialised courts in Stockholm, but claimants and defendants from Ystad and the wider Skåne region regularly use both local courts and national venues depending on the nature of the dispute.
Antitrust disputes can be legally and factually complex. You may need a lawyer in the following common situations:
- You suspect competitors or suppliers have entered a cartel or price-fixing arrangement that harms your business or customers.
- You believe a dominant competitor is abusing its market position by excluding rivals, imposing unfair trading conditions or imposing discriminatory terms.
- You are a business facing a dawn raid, inspection or an investigation by Konkurrensverket or another authority and need to protect your rights and manage compliance during the probe.
- You want to bring a private damages claim for overcharges, lost profits, or loss of business caused by anti-competitive conduct.
- You are a company planning a merger or cooperation agreement and need to assess whether competition law risks could trigger enforcement action or require notification.
- You need help seeking interim measures - for example a preliminary injunction to stop ongoing anti-competitive conduct while the dispute is resolved.
- You are served with a claim or an order related to competition law and need defence strategies, evidence handling and an assessment of potential fines or remedies.
In each of these situations a specialist lawyer will advise on procedural steps, evidence, likely outcomes, and the interplay between national and EU-level law.
Key legal and procedural aspects to understand when dealing with antitrust litigation in Ystad and Sweden more broadly include:
- Applicable law - Swedish competition law largely mirrors EU competition principles. Articles 101 and 102 TFEU apply directly and are supplemented by the Competition Act. For cross-border or sectoral issues, EU law often takes precedence.
- Enforcement authorities - Konkurrensverket is the national competition authority responsible for investigations, dawn raids, and bringing cases before courts. For the most serious cartel matters the European Commission and other national authorities in the European Competition Network may also be involved.
- Specialized courts - Major competition law disputes and appeals are typically handled by the Patent and Market Court - Patent- och marknadsdomstolen - which is a specialised division in Stockholm, and the Patent and Market Court of Appeal for appeals. Local district courts such as Ystads tingsrätt can hear certain civil claims, but complex competition litigation often proceeds in the specialised courts.
- Remedies and sanctions - Possible outcomes include injunctions, orders to cease anti-competitive conduct, damages to compensate victims, and fines. Under EU practice fines may reach up to 10 percent of a companys annual worldwide turnover for serious infringements. Swedish enforcement can result in administrative measures and court-ordered remedies.
- Private enforcement - Businesses and consumers can bring private claims for damages in civil courts. Private claims rely on proving an infringement, causation and quantifying losses. Claimants may use national courts to recover damages even when the original infringement was investigated by Konkurrensverket or the European Commission.
- Evidence and investigative powers - Competition authorities have powers to inspect premises, seize documents and require information. Defendants have procedural rights during inspections, including the right to legal counsel. Preserving documents and electronic evidence is critical.
- Limitation periods and timing - Civil claims are subject to limitation periods and procedural deadlines. Time limits vary by claim type and circumstances, so prompt action is important.
- Cooperation, leniency and settlements - Leniency programmes at EU and national level can enable participants in cartels to receive reduced sanctions in exchange for cooperation. Settlement procedures also exist that can speed resolution but have specific legal requirements.
Antitrust violations typically include cartels or price-fixing agreements between competitors, market-sharing agreements, agreements that limit production or fix resale conditions, and abuse of a dominant market position such as refusal to supply, predatory pricing or discriminatory practices. Whether conduct is unlawful depends on market context, effects on competition and any applicable exemptions.
The Swedish Competition Authority - Konkurrensverket - is the primary national enforcer. You can submit information about suspected infringements to Konkurrensverket for investigation. Private parties can also bring civil claims in court. If the matter has an EU dimension, the European Commission or other national authorities in the European Competition Network may be involved. Consult a lawyer to decide the best route.
Yes. Private parties can sue for damages in civil courts for losses caused by unlawful anti-competitive conduct. You must prove the infringement, that it caused your loss, and quantify damages. Private claims can be complex and often require economic analysis to demonstrate overcharges, lost profits or other harm.
Remedies include injunctions to stop anti-competitive conduct, orders to change business practices, damages to compensate victims, and fines or penalties for offenders. In EU-level cartel cases fines can be substantial. Courts can also declare agreements void or order behavioural or structural remedies where appropriate.
Immediately contact legal counsel experienced in competition law. Do not obstruct the inspection, but exercise your rights - for example seek clarification about the scope of the inspection, identify privileged material, and instruct employees on what to disclose. Preserve documents and avoid deleting or altering electronic records. A lawyer will guide you through the inspection and on subsequent steps.
Duration varies widely. Administrative investigations by Konkurrensverket can take months to years depending on complexity. Court litigation, especially cases involving economic evidence and expert testimony, can also extend over months or several years. Settlement or ADR can shorten the timeline. Early case assessment by a lawyer helps set realistic expectations for timing.
Yes. Civil claims are subject to statutory limitation periods and other procedural deadlines. The exact time limit depends on the nature of the claim and when you became aware of the damage. Because limitation periods can bar claims, seek legal advice promptly to preserve rights and evidence.
Evidence commonly includes internal communications, contracts, invoices, pricing data, market studies, witness statements and expert economic analysis showing the effect of the conduct on prices, output or competition. Obtaining and preserving documentary and electronic evidence early is essential. Authorities may also have their own investigative findings that support private claims.
Yes. Authorities sometimes act on whistleblower information. Leniency programmes across the EU and at national level provide incentives to insiders to come forward in exchange for reduced fines, provided the information is timely and adds significant value to an investigation. Whistleblowers should seek legal advice to understand protections and possible consequences.
You can engage specialised competition lawyers from anywhere in Sweden or the EU. For matters ultimately litigated in specialised courts in Stockholm, firms with experience at the Patent and Market Court and in EU competition law are often preferred. For practical matters and client meetings, a local lawyer in Ystad or Skåne can be helpful. Choose counsel with documented competition litigation experience and knowledge of national and EU procedures.
Useful bodies and organisations to consult when you need further factual information or to initiate a complaint include:
- Konkurrensverket - the Swedish Competition Authority for guidance on investigations and enforcement policy.
- Patent- och marknadsdomstolen and Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen - specialised courts that handle complex competition law litigation and appeals.
- Konsumentverket - the Swedish Consumer Agency, which handles consumer protection issues that can overlap with competition concerns.
- The European Commission - Directorate-General for Competition, for EU-level enforcement, case law and guidelines relating to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
- The Swedish Bar Association - Advokatsamfundet - for directories of qualified lawyers and information about professional standards.
- Relevant economic and legal research centres at Swedish universities that publish studies and guidance on market definition, damages quantification and antitrust economics.
These organisations produce guidance, decisions and explanatory materials that can help you understand legal obligations, ongoing case law and enforcement priorities.
If you believe you have an antitrust issue or have been contacted by an authority, consider the following practical next steps:
- Preserve evidence - secure documents, emails, contracts and electronic records. Avoid deleting or altering files that could be relevant.
- Seek specialist legal advice early - contact a competition law lawyer with litigation experience to assess your case, advise on procedural risks and help with communications to authorities or counterparties.
- Prepare an initial case assessment - lawyers will evaluate the legal basis for claims or defences, available evidence, likely remedies and costs.
- Consider interim protections - if urgent relief is needed, discuss the possibility of preliminary injunctions or other interim measures with counsel.
- Evaluate enforcement options - your lawyer will advise whether to notify Konkurrensverket, pursue a private damages claim, seek settlement, or consider alternative dispute resolution.
- Plan for costs and funding - discuss fee models, potential legal aid if applicable, and whether third-party funding or insurance may be relevant.
- Coordinate with advisers - complex matters often require economic experts, forensic IT specialists and local counsel. Build a team early to strengthen evidence and expert analysis.
Antitrust litigation can affect the commercial future of businesses and the rights of consumers. Acting promptly, preserving evidence and working with experienced competition counsel are the best ways to protect interests and improve the chance of a favorable outcome.
