Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Bad-faith insurance refers to conduct by an insurance company that unreasonably denies, delays, underpays, or fails to investigate and process an insureds valid claim under an insurance policy. In Philadelphia, as in the rest of Pennsylvania, bad-faith claims arise most often in first-party contexts - for example home, auto, health, disability, or life insurance claims - but can also involve alleged failures by an insurer to defend or to reasonably settle third-party liability claims on behalf of an insured. Pennsylvania law recognizes a private cause of action for insurer bad-faith conduct and provides potential remedies including compensatory damages, certain consequential damages, and in some situations attorney fees and punitive-type awards. Enforcement and consumer protection also include administrative oversight by the Pennsylvania insurance regulator and civil remedies in Philadelphia courts.
Insurance disputes can be legally and technically complex. You may need a lawyer if any of the following apply:
- Your insurer denies a claim that you believe is clearly covered under your policy.
- The insurer pays only a fraction of a claim without a sufficient explanation for the valuation or reduction.
- Your insurer unreasonably delays investigating or paying your claim, causing you additional financial harm.
- Your insurer refuses to defend you or refuses to settle within policy limits in a liability case, exposing you to an excess judgment.
- The insurer rescinds a policy or asserts a coverage exclusion based on suspect factual or legal grounds.
- You are dealing with complex valuation disputes - for example in catastrophic property losses, long-term disability denials, or complex medical necessity arguments.
- You have been pressured into signing releases or settlement agreements without full information.
An experienced insurance bad-faith attorney can assess whether the insurer acted unreasonably, preserve evidence, handle communications with the insurer, advise on administrative complaints, and if necessary file litigation in the appropriate Philadelphia or federal court. Attorneys with experience in bad-faith cases also know how to present damages beyond the policy benefits, such as delay damages, consequential losses, and possible fee awards allowed under Pennsylvania law.
Key legal points that are particularly relevant in Philadelphia and across Pennsylvania include:
- Pennsylvania law recognizes causes of action for bad-faith handling of insurance claims. Insureds may pursue civil remedies when an insurer acts in bad faith in denying, delaying, or failing to pay benefits. A statutory provision commonly cited in Pennsylvania bad-faith litigation permits recovery of certain additional damages and attorney fees in appropriate cases.
- Types of claims. Bad-faith issues commonly arise in both first-party claims - where the insured seeks benefits owed under the policy - and third-party liability situations - where the insurer has a duty to defend and to reasonably settle claims against the insured.
- Remedies. Remedies may include the amount of the policy benefits wrongfully withheld, consequential damages caused by delay or denial, statutory awards such as attorney fees in select situations, and punitive-style damages where the insurer's conduct is particularly egregious. The scope of available remedies can depend on whether the claim is first-party or third-party and on specific factual issues.
- Statute of limitations and timing. Time limits for bringing claims vary by cause of action. Contract-based claims commonly have longer filing periods than tort claims. Because deadlines can be short and may run from different trigger dates, you should seek counsel promptly after a denial or adverse action.
- Administrative enforcement. The Pennsylvania insurance regulator handles consumer complaints and enforces unfair claims practices rules. Filing a complaint with the regulator is often a parallel administrative option, though it does not always substitute for private civil remedies.
- Local court practice. Claims brought in Philadelphia will proceed through the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas for state-law actions, or in federal court if a federal basis for jurisdiction exists. Local practice rules, discovery procedures, mediation requirements, and court timelines will affect how a case progresses.
Bad-faith conduct generally means the insurer unreasonably refused to pay or delayed payment of a valid claim, failed to investigate properly, offered an unreasonably low settlement, misrepresented policy language, or failed to defend or settle third-party claims within policy limits. Whether conduct is legally bad faith depends on the reasonableness of the insurers actions under the facts and the policy terms.
Not always. Many disputes are resolved by appeal to a claims supervisor, submitting a comprehensive claim supplement, using an independent appraisal or umpire process if your policy allows, mediation, or filing a complaint with the Pennsylvania insurance regulator. If those measures fail, filing a civil lawsuit may be necessary.
The time limit depends on the legal theory you bring. Contract claims often have different statutes of limitations than tort claims. Because the applicable deadline can vary based on the facts and the type of claim, you should consult an attorney promptly to avoid missing critical deadlines.
Under Pennsylvania law, there are circumstances in which a court may award attorney fees and other statutory relief in connection with an insurer's bad-faith conduct, but recovery of fees is not automatic in every case. Availability of fees depends on the statute or legal theory relied upon and on the specific facts, so get legal advice about likely remedies.
Key evidence includes the insurance policy and endorsements, claim forms, adjustment notes, correspondence with the insurer, recorded statements, estimates, medical records, repair invoices, photos, timelines of communications, internal insurer documents if available, and any proof of the actual financial harm you suffered due to denial or delay.
Filing a complaint with the state regulator can prompt a review and sometimes lead to an administrative resolution. It also creates an official record of your dispute. However, regulator action may be slow and does not always provide the direct compensation you might seek in civil court. It is often used in parallel with legal counsel pursuing civil remedies.
A coverage dispute arises when the insurer and insured disagree about whether a claim falls within policy terms or limits. Bad-faith conduct exists where the insurer handles a covered claim in an unreasonable manner - for example by ignoring evidence, failing to investigate, or denying payment without a reasonable basis. Not every coverage denial is bad faith; the insurer must have acted unreasonably under the circumstances.
Yes. Denials of health or disability benefits are a common basis for bad-faith claims when the insurer unreasonably delayed or denied benefits the policy otherwise covers. These claims often involve detailed medical evidence and may require expert testimony to show the insurers denial was without a reasonable basis.
If an insurer refuses a reasonable settlement offer within policy limits and a resulting judgment exceeds those limits, the insured may sue the insurer for bad faith for exposing the insured to an excess judgment. Proving such a claim typically requires showing that a reasonable settlement was available, the insurer knew or should have known about it, and the insurer unreasonably declined to settle.
Billing arrangements vary. Many bad-faith attorneys handle cases on a contingency-fee basis, meaning the attorney gets a percentage of any recovery. Others may charge hourly rates or a hybrid arrangement. Fee agreements should be clear in writing and explain how costs and expenses are handled.
Helpful organizations and resources for insurance consumers in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania include the Pennsylvania insurance regulator for consumer complaints and information, the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas for local civil filings, the Pennsylvania Bar Association and the Philadelphia Bar Association to locate experienced insurance litigation attorneys, and local legal aid organizations that may help people with limited means. Consumer hotlines, insurance ombudsman programs, and state-run complaint procedures can also offer guidance and administrative remedies.
If you believe an insurer has acted in bad faith, consider the following steps:
- Preserve documentation. Gather the policy, all correspondence, claim numbers, photos, invoices, estimates, medical records, and notes of all communications including dates and the names of representatives you spoke with.
- Make a written demand. Send a clear, documented demand to the insurer summarizing the claim, damages, and what you believe is due. Keep copies of all communications.
- File a regulatory complaint. Consider filing a complaint with the Pennsylvania insurance regulator to create an administrative record and possibly trigger an investigation.
- Consult an attorney promptly. An experienced bad-faith attorney can evaluate your claim, explain your legal options, preserve evidence, calculate damages, and advise about time limits and local court procedures in Philadelphia.
- Consider alternative dispute resolution. Your lawyer may recommend appraisal, mediation, or arbitration as faster or less costly ways to resolve the dispute.
- Prepare for litigation if necessary. If a negotiated resolution is not possible, your attorney will advise you on filing a lawsuit and will handle the litigation process, including discovery, motions, and trial or settlement negotiations.
Acting quickly and keeping good records improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome. If you need legal advice, seek a Philadelphia-based lawyer who regularly handles insurance bad-faith matters and can explain your rights under Pennsylvania law and local court procedures.
