Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Defamation law in Mansfield follows the law of England and Wales. Defamation is a civil claim brought by a person or company who says that a false statement has been published about them and that the statement has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation. Statements can be written or spoken, and online posts, social media updates, videos and other publications can all give rise to a defamation claim. The key legislation shaping modern defamation law is the Defamation Act 2013, together with long-established common law principles.
Defamation disputes can affect your employment, business relationships, personal life and mental wellbeing. You may need a lawyer if:
- You or your business has been accused publicly of wrongdoing, dishonesty or other conduct that could damage reputation.
- A statement is widely shared online or in the local or national media and is causing demonstrable harm.
- You want to ask a publisher to remove or correct material, and you need help drafting a formal legal notice or pre-action letter.
- You are the subject of anonymous attacks and need to identify the poster by asking the court for disclosure from platforms or ISPs.
- You are threatened with court proceedings and need to assess the strength of the claim and the best defence strategy.
- You require urgent court protection - for example an injunction to stop publication or further republication.
- You want to negotiate a settlement, apology, or retraction, or explore alternative dispute resolution such as mediation.
Key aspects of defamation law relevant to people in Mansfield and across England and Wales include:
- Governing law: Defamation claims are civil claims in the courts of England and Wales. Mansfield is in Nottinghamshire and cases would be dealt with by the appropriate county court or, for more complex or high-value disputes, the High Court.
- Serious-harm requirement: The Defamation Act 2013 requires claimants to show that the statement has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation. For companies and other bodies, the claimant must show that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious financial loss.
- Publication: A defamatory statement is one that is communicated to at least one person other than the claimant. Online posts, comments, and shared content are treated as publications.
- Defences: Common defences include truth, honest opinion, and publication on a matter of public interest. There are also defences based on privilege in limited circumstances - for example where statements are made in certain legal or parliamentary contexts.
- Website operators and online platforms: The law recognises special considerations for online publication. Website operators have access to statutory defences in some cases, and there are established procedures for requesting removal of content from platforms. Courts may also consider the scale and permanence of online republication.
- Limitation period: The time limit for bringing most defamation claims is short - typically one year from the date of publication. There are limited and exceptional circumstances in which a court may allow claims outside this time, but strict timing rules apply.
- Remedies: Remedies can include damages for loss of reputation and distress, orders for correction or an apology, and injunctions to prevent further publication. The court will balance reputation protection with free expression where relevant.
Defamation occurs when someone publishes a false statement about you that harms your reputation. The publication can be written, spoken, broadcast or online. To succeed, you must normally show that the statement refers to you and has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to your reputation.
The usual limitation period is one year from the date of publication. This is a short period compared with many other civil claims. You should seek legal advice promptly if you are considering a claim because late claims are often barred unless the court allows an exception in rare circumstances.
Yes. Truth is a complete defence if you can prove that the substantial truth of the imputation alleged to be defamatory is likely to be accepted by the court. The defendant must typically show that the facts alleged are true in substance and fact.
Honest opinion (formerly called fair comment) protects expressions of opinion rather than statements of fact. To rely on this defence, the defendant must show that the statement was a recognisable opinion, that it was based on facts that were true or privileged and that an honest person could have held the opinion on those facts.
Yes. You may be able to bring an action against the website or platform that hosted the content and apply for a court order to require the platform or your internet service provider to disclose the identity of the anonymous poster. These orders, often referred to as Norwich Pharmacal orders, require specialist legal steps and court permission.
Do not respond publicly without legal advice. Preserve evidence by taking dated screenshots, saving URLs, and keeping copies of communications. Note how widely the material has been shared and any impact on work or business. Contact the platform to report the content and consider getting legal advice about sending a formal notice or taking court action.
Yes, a company can bring a defamation claim but faces a higher threshold. The company must show that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious financial loss. Small companies can bring claims, but courts scrutinise corporate claims closely to ensure they meet this test.
Courts can award damages to compensate for harm to reputation and for distress, order corrections or apologies, and grant injunctions to prevent further publication. The size of damages depends on the seriousness of the defamation, the extent of publication, and the impact on the claimant.
Yes, the courts balance reputational rights against freedom of expression. Where matters of public interest are involved, the public interest defence and considerations under human rights law can protect legitimate reporting and commentary. Legal advice is important to assess this balance in specific cases.
Legal aid is rarely available for defamation claims because these are usually private civil matters. Funding options include privately funded solicitors, conditional fee agreements or other funding arrangements. Discuss funding and cost risks with a solicitor before proceeding.
Useful organisations and sources of practical help include:
- Citizens Advice for general guidance and initial practical steps.
- The Law Society of England and Wales for finding qualified solicitors who practise in media and defamation law.
- The Bar Council and local chambers for specialist barristers.
- Local Citizens Advice and community legal advice centres in Nottinghamshire and Mansfield for local support.
- Complaint procedures of major online platforms and social media services for takedown requests and reporting abusive content.
- The Information Commissioner’s Office for issues that also touch on data protection and privacy.
If you believe you have been defamed in Mansfield, consider the following steps:
- Act quickly - note dates and preserve evidence, including screenshots, URLs and witness details.
- Do not post further public responses without advice - an ill-advised reply can worsen matters.
- Contact a solicitor experienced in defamation and media law for an early case assessment and advice on strategy, costs and likely outcomes.
- Consider sending a pre-action letter setting out your concerns and seeking correction, apology or removal - a lawyer can draft this to comply with pre-action protocols.
- Explore alternative dispute resolution such as mediation, which can be quicker and cheaper than court.
- If identity of a poster is unknown, discuss with your lawyer the possibility of seeking disclosure orders from platforms or ISPs.
Every situation is different. Early legal advice will help you understand your options, the likely costs and the risks involved, and will assist you in choosing the most appropriate route to protect your reputation or to respond to allegations.
