Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Defamation is a civil wrong that arises when someone publishes a false statement about another person or organization that harms their reputation. In York - which is part of the province of Ontario - defamation claims are governed by provincial and common law principles developed by Ontario courts and the Supreme Court of Canada. The claim can be brought for libel (written or communicated in a permanent form) or slander (spoken or transient forms). Defamation law balances the protection of reputation against freedom of expression, and courts consider context, truth, intention, and public interest when deciding cases.
Defamation cases can be legally and factually complex. You may need a lawyer if any of the following apply to your situation:
- You are named or clearly identifiable in a false statement that has caused measurable harm to your reputation, business, or livelihood.
- The statements were published online, in print, on broadcast media, or shared widely on social media, and the publication continues or reappears.
- You want a court order to remove content or prevent further publication, which usually requires urgent legal action.
- You face a defamation lawsuit and need to understand defences, evidence rules, and potential damages exposure.
- The matter involves complex issues such as cross-border publications, anonymous posters, or a mixture of factual assertions and opinion.
- The dispute raises Charter issues, public-interest defences, or anti-SLAPP principles where strategic litigation and costs risk are important considerations.
Key aspects of defamation law and procedures that are particularly relevant in York and throughout Ontario include:
- Governing law - Defamation claims in Ontario are primarily civil tort claims decided under common law; certain statutes also interact with claims. The Libel and Slander Act in Ontario contains procedural and damage-related provisions that can apply in libel and slander actions.
- Limitation period - Most civil claims, including defamation, are subject to Ontario's Limitations Act. Generally you have two years from the date you knew or ought to have known about the publication to start a claim. Timely action is important to preserve your rights.
- Publication - A statement is defamatory if it is communicated to someone other than the plaintiff and tends to lower the plaintiff's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person. Online posts, comments, and reposts can be publications for the purpose of a claim.
- Defences - Common defences include truth (justification), honest opinion (fair comment), qualified or absolute privilege, and responsible communication on matters of public interest - a defence recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in Grant v Torstar Corp. The precise application of these defences depends on the facts and context.
- Remedies - Courts can award damages - general, special, aggravated, and punitive - and can order injunctions, retractions, apologies, or orders to remove online content. Courts are cautious about prior restraints because of freedom of expression concerns.
- Forum and procedure - Defamation lawsuits are usually brought in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Smaller value claims may be brought in Small Claims Court if the amount sought fits that court's monetary limit. Pre-litigation steps such as demand letters, takedown requests, and alternative dispute resolution are common.
- Internet and social media - Ontario courts apply traditional defamation principles to online speech, but issues like jurisdiction, anonymity, and service on third parties can complicate litigation. The Supreme Court of Canada has issued important rulings on online issues, for example on hyperlinking and responsible journalism.
A statement is defamatory if it lowers a person or business in the estimation of right-thinking members of society, exposes them to hatred, contempt, or ridicule, or causes others to shun or avoid them. The statement must be false or convey a false meaning; statements of pure fact that are true are not defamatory.
Under Ontario law you generally have two years from the date you knew, or ought reasonably to have known, about the publication to commence a lawsuit. Because online material can be republished or remain accessible, preserve evidence early and get legal advice quickly.
Typical defences are truth (justification), honest opinion or fair comment, qualified or absolute privilege (for example in parliamentary or judicial proceedings), and responsible communication on matters of public interest - a defence designed to protect diligent reporting on issues of public concern. The availability of each defence depends on the facts.
Yes. Posts, comments, shares, and other online communications can constitute publication and support a defamation claim. Challenges include identifying the author, determining jurisdiction if the publisher is outside Ontario, and dealing with service and platform takedown procedures.
Remedies can include damages to compensate for harm to reputation, orders for corrections or apologies, injunctions to prevent further publication, and orders requiring removal of content. Aggravated or punitive damages are possible in cases of particularly malicious conduct. Courts will assess damages based on the seriousness of the allegation, reach of the publication, and conduct of the defendant.
Often yes. A carefully worded demand letter seeking a retraction, correction, or apology can resolve the issue more quickly and cheaply than litigation. Many disputes are settled through negotiation, mediation, or formal apology. However, if the defendant refuses to act and damage is significant, litigation may be necessary.
Identifying anonymous online posters can require court proceedings to compel platforms or internet service providers to disclose user information. Courts will balance privacy and freedom of expression against your right to seek redress; subpoenas or Norwich orders may be used to discover the identity of posters, but the process can be time-consuming and may have costs.
Pure opinion that does not assert provable facts is more likely to be protected. The honest opinion defence allows opinions based on known facts. However, if an opinion implies false factual assertions, it can still be defamatory. The context and wording matter.
Yes. Republishing a defamatory statement can be treated as a new publication and may give rise to liability. Exercise caution when repeating allegations, sharing posts, or forwarding messages - especially if you add commentary that suggests endorsement.
Costs vary by lawyer and the complexity of the case. Many defamation lawyers charge hourly rates, but contingency or mixed-fee arrangements may be possible in some circumstances. Ask lawyers about fee structures, estimated costs, and the potential for cost awards if the case proceeds to court. Keep in mind litigation can be expensive and outcomes are never guaranteed.
When seeking help or information in York and Ontario, consider the following resources and organizations for guidance or referrals:
- Law Society of Ontario - for lawyer licensing, practice area referrals, and regulatory information.
- Ontario Superior Court of Justice - for information on civil procedure and where defamation claims are heard.
- Community legal clinics in York Region - local clinics can provide limited assistance or referrals for people with low income.
- Canadian Bar Association and Ontario Bar Association - directories and resources to find experienced civil litigation lawyers.
- Public legal education organizations - provincial and local PLEI groups offer plain-language guides about civil claims and court processes.
- Internet platforms and hosting services - most social media platforms and websites have complaint and takedown procedures for defamatory or harassing content; follow their published processes to request removal.
- Local mediation and alternative dispute resolution services - mediation can be an effective way to resolve reputation disputes without full litigation.
If you believe you are a victim of defamation in York, consider the following practical next steps:
- Preserve evidence immediately - take screenshots, save web pages, note dates, times, platforms, and any witnesses. Keep originals where possible.
- Identify the publisher - try to find who posted the statement and whether the platform or host is within Ontario or Canada.
- Consider a demand letter - a lawyer can draft a letter requesting correction, retraction, or removal and setting out potential legal consequences if the publisher refuses.
- Weigh remedies - discuss with a lawyer whether a negotiated resolution, cease and desist, takedown requests, mediation, or court action is most appropriate given the scope of harm and costs involved.
- Act before limitation periods expire - consult a lawyer promptly to ensure you do not miss the deadline to start a claim.
- Choose the right lawyer - look for a civil litigator with experience in defamation and internet-related disputes. Ask about experience with injunctions, cross-border publication, and the cost structure for your matter.
- Prepare for possible outcomes - litigation can lead to compensation, retractions, or no relief. Be realistic about time, cost, and the emotional toll of public disputes.
If you are unsure what to do first, schedule an initial consultation with a lawyer experienced in defamation matters to review your evidence, explain your options, and outline a plan tailored to your situation.
