Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Securities law in New York City combines federal rules with state and local enforcement. The city sits at the heart of the US financial system, and NYC regulators actively oversee markets, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and public offerings. Practitioners routinely navigate actions by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Attorney General, and the New York Department of Financial Services.
In practice, securities matters in NYC often involve preventing fraud, ensuring proper registration, and enforcing disclosure standards. Attorneys help clients with investigations, regulatory filings, private placements, and dispute resolution. The complexity and speed of enforcement in a fast-moving market require precise legal counsel who understands both federal statutes and New York state law.
New York securities enforcement relies on a mix of state statutes and federal law. Below are two key state statutes by name, plus relevant federal framework that applies across New York and NYC.
The Martin Act provides broad authority to investigate securities fraud inside New York, including non-fraudulent conduct that may involve misrepresentation or manipulation. It is a powerful tool used by the New York Attorney General and by the Department of Financial Services in enforcement actions. The statute operates alongside federal securities laws to shape NY enforcement strategy.
Effective and widely cited in NY enforcement practice, the Martin Act has evolved through amendments and court interpretations over the years. For official guidance on the Martin Act, see the New York Attorney General's investor protection resources. New York Attorney General - Martin Act.
General Business Law § 349 prohibits deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any business, trade, or commerce in New York. Investors can rely on § 349 to pursue consumer protection claims arising from securities offerings or investment schemes. This statute is frequently invoked in securities-related consumer actions in NYC courts and administrative proceedings.
For official text and context, see New York state legislature resources and state government references. (General Business Law references are maintained by the NY Senate and related state sources.)
The federal framework governs most securities offerings and market conduct nationwide, including New York. The Securities Act of 1933 imposes registration and disclosure requirements for new securities offerings at the federal level. It forms the baseline for much NYC enforcement against unregistered offerings.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 covers ongoing trading, broker-dealer registration, and market manipulation concerns. These federal provisions interact with New York enforcement to shape actions in NYC courts and regulatory agencies. For the federal acts, see the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's summaries and text.
For authoritative federal background, see the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on SEC.gov.
Key dates to know in a historical sense are that the Securities Act of 1933 was enacted on May 27, 1933, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 followed on June 6, 1934. These acts are foundational nationwide, including in New York City.
Official federal information can be found at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Martin Act grants broad authority to investigate securities fraud in New York. It empowers state regulators to pursue actions for investor protection and market integrity. Understanding its scope helps you prepare a measured defense or compliance plan.
Article 23-A covers anti-fraud and investor-protection powers used by NY agencies. It underpins investigations of misrepresentations, omissions, and manipulative practices in NY markets. Counsel helps assess exposure and respond to inquiries.
Section 349 enables consumer protection claims for deceptive acts in business practices, including securities offerings. It provides a consumer-friendly pathway to challenge misleading conduct. A lawyer clarifies whether it applies to your situation.
Registration requirements apply to public offerings and certain private placements. An attorney helps determine exemption eligibility and guides you through the jurisdictional compliance steps in NYC.
Costs vary by matter complexity and attorney experience. Expect hourly fees, retainer arrangements, and possible success-based or fixed-fee components for specific tasks.
Timeline depends on the case type and forum. Investigations may run months, while civil actions can extend over a year or more, especially with complex motions and discovery.
Local familiarity with NYC courts and regulators is valuable. A NY-licensed attorney can better manage filings, appearances, and jurisdiction-specific requirements.
A broker-dealer executes trades for clients, while an investment adviser provides ongoing investment advice for a fee. New York licensing and registration rules apply to each category differently.
Defending without counsel in NYC regulatory actions is risky. An attorney helps with evidence preservation, strategy, and communications with regulators.
Complaints typically initiate with a regulator or the NY Attorney General’s office. An attorney helps prepare the complaint, gather documents, and respond to inquiries.
Yes. Federal securities laws govern national markets; New York law adds state-specific enforcement and consumer protections. Coordinated strategy often yields the best outcome.
Regulation D exemptions apply nationally, including NY, but require strict investor, issuer, and disclosure criteria. A securities attorney helps confirm eligibility and structure.
These organizations offer official guidance and access to regulatory information relevant to securities in New York City.
