Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Whistleblowing in New Zealand is commonly understood as making a disclosure about serious wrongdoing in an organisation so that the matter can be investigated and addressed. The main legal framework that provides protection for people who raise these kinds of concerns is the Protected Disclosures Act 2000. That Act sets out how to make a protected disclosure, who is eligible for protection, which types of wrongdoing qualify, and what protections are available.
The term Qui Tam refers to a type of claim under foreign laws - most notably the United States False Claims Act - where a private individual can sue on behalf of the state to recover money lost through fraud and receive a share of the recovery. New Zealand does not have an equivalent nationwide Qui Tam regime that gives private individuals a general right to bring civil actions on behalf of the Crown for financial recovery. Instead, investigations and prosecutions for fraud against the Crown are normally carried out by public agencies, such as the Serious Fraud Office or Crown Law, often following a disclosure from a member of the public or an employee.
If you live or work in Feilding and are considering raising concerns about wrongdoing, this guide explains the local legal landscape, when you may need a lawyer, practical steps, frequently asked questions, and where to get help.
Whistleblower matters can be legally and practically complex. A lawyer can help you understand your rights, prepare and frame a disclosure so it meets the legal requirements for protection, preserve evidence safely, and manage risks such as allegations of defamation or confidentiality breaches. Common situations where legal help is valuable include:
- You fear or have experienced retaliation at work after raising concerns, including dismissal, demotion, harassment, or other detrimental actions.
- You are unsure whether the conduct you want to disclose qualifies as "serious wrongdoing" under the law.
- The matter could involve criminal conduct, serious financial loss to the Crown, or regulatory breaches that might lead to prosecution or civil recovery.
- You want to make an external disclosure to a regulator or authority but are uncertain which authority is appropriate or how to do so without losing legal protection.
- The disclosure could expose you to defamation risk if made public and you want to manage or reduce that risk.
- You need assistance bringing a personal grievance to the Employment Relations Authority or seeking remedies such as compensation or reinstatement for reprisals.
- You need advice about practical steps to preserve evidence and to document the complaint in a way that supports later examination or legal action.
This section summarises the key legal points that are especially relevant to whistleblowers in Feilding and elsewhere in New Zealand. It is an overview and not a substitute for tailored legal advice.
- Protected Disclosures Act 2000: This Act provides protections for people who make disclosures about serious wrongdoing. A disclosure is protected if it is made in good faith and the person has a reasonable belief that the information tends to show serious wrongdoing.
- Who is covered: Employees, contractors, volunteers and former employees may be covered. The Act sets out specific internal and external disclosure pathways and identifies the types of recipients who can receive protected external disclosures.
- What counts as serious wrongdoing: Typical examples include criminal offending, fraud, corruption, misuse of public funds, danger to public health or safety, environmental damage, and cover-ups of those matters. The threshold is higher than a simple workplace complaint about management style or individual performance.
- Internal versus external disclosures: The Act encourages internal reporting to an appropriate person within the organisation. If internal reporting is not appropriate, or if concerns are not addressed, the Act permits disclosure to specified external authorities such as the Ombudsman, Auditor-General, Serious Fraud Office, Police, Health and Disability Commissioner, WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators depending on the subject matter.
- Protection from reprisals: The Act prohibits detrimental treatment because of a protected disclosure. Remedies can include personal grievance claims under the Employment Relations Act, compensation, reinstatement, and orders preventing further reprisals. Employers are expected to keep the whistleblower's identity confidential except where disclosure is necessary in the course of investigation and the whistleblower consents.
- Employment remedies and time limits: If you suffer reprisals you may have options under employment law. Timeframes apply to personal grievances - for example, a personal grievance must generally be raised within 90 days of the action complained of. Acting promptly and seeking legal advice is therefore important.
- Defamation and confidentiality risks: If disclosures are made publicly and allegations are not well founded, there is a risk of defamation claims. Confidential information and privacy laws can also affect what you can disclose and to whom.
- No general Qui Tam mechanism: New Zealand has no general Qui Tam statute that allows private citizens to sue on behalf of the Crown to recover public funds and keep a share of the proceeds. Recoveries for fiscal harm are usually pursued by public agencies following investigation.
A disclosure is likely to be protected if it concerns serious wrongdoing as defined by the Protected Disclosures Act 2000, is made by a person covered by the Act (such as an employee, contractor or volunteer), and is made in good faith with a reasonable belief that the information tends to show serious wrongdoing. The disclosure should be made to one of the authorised recipients - typically an appropriate internal person or an external regulator listed by the Act.
Protected disclosures are ideally made first to an appropriate person within your organisation, for example a manager or nominated officer. If that is not suitable, the Act lists certain external authorities that may receive disclosures depending on the nature of the wrongdoing - for example the Ombudsman for public sector matters, the Serious Fraud Office for serious financial wrongdoing, the Auditor-General for public entities and other regulators for sector-specific matters.
Yes, anonymous disclosures can be made. However, anonymity can make it harder for investigators to follow up and for you to receive protection if reprisals occur. In practice, it is often better to seek advice first about how to maintain confidentiality while providing enough information and evidence for an investigation.
The law prohibits detrimental treatment - such as dismissal, demotion, disciplinary action, or harassment - because of a protected disclosure. Remedies may include bringing a personal grievance in the Employment Relations Authority, claims for compensation or reinstatement, and other orders to stop the reprisal. Seek legal advice quickly because time limits apply for some remedies.
Preserve and record evidence carefully - dates, emails, documents, names of witnesses and what was said. Put your report in writing if possible. Consider whether to follow internal procedures first. Speak with a lawyer, union representative or a community legal service to understand risks and the appropriate authority to receive the disclosure.
Most organisations have obligations to assess and, where appropriate, investigate allegations of serious wrongdoing. Public sector agencies in particular are expected to investigate protected disclosures impartially and to take appropriate action. The scope and quality of an investigation can vary, and a regulator or external agency may need to be involved for serious matters.
There is a risk of defamation if untrue allegations are published publicly without a solid factual basis. Disclosures made in good faith to an appropriate internal person or to an authorised external authority for the purpose of investigation are generally made in a protected context. Public disclosure should be treated carefully and only considered after legal advice.
Serious financial wrongdoing or fraud against the Crown is typically investigated by agencies such as the Serious Fraud Office, Police or relevant regulatory bodies. These agencies decide whether to prosecute or pursue civil recovery. Private individuals cannot normally bring Qui Tam style claims to recover public funds on behalf of the Crown.
There is no strict statute of limitations for making a protected disclosure itself, but there are time limits for bringing certain legal proceedings, such as a personal grievance under the Employment Relations Act. Personal grievances generally must be raised within 90 days of the alleged action. If you face reprisals, act promptly and seek legal advice so you do not miss critical deadlines.
Look for employment law, public law or regulatory lawyers with experience in protected disclosures, employment disputes and investigations. The New Zealand Law Society and local legal directories can help locate practitioners. Community Law Centres, Citizens Advice Bureau and union representatives may provide initial guidance if you need a more affordable first step.
Below are organisations and bodies that can be helpful when considering a disclosure or seeking support. These are general categories of resources available across New Zealand and in the Manawatu region near Feilding.
- Serious Fraud Office - for suspected serious financial wrongdoing.
- Ombudsman - for public sector disclosures and complaints about public agencies.
- Auditor-General - for concerns involving public sector financial management and use of public resources.
- Health and Disability Commissioner - for serious health sector concerns.
- WorkSafe New Zealand - for health and safety risks in the workplace.
- Police - for criminal offending.
- Employment New Zealand - information on employment rights and personal grievances.
- New Zealand Law Society - for lists of practitioners and lawyer referral services.
- Community Law Centres and Citizens Advice Bureau - free or low-cost legal information and support.
- Unions - for employees who are union members and need representation.
- Privacy Commissioner - for concerns involving personal information or privacy breaches.
If you are thinking about making a whistleblower disclosure in Feilding, consider the following practical steps:
- Pause and document: Collect and securely store relevant evidence, dates and details. Keep copies of emails and documents in a safe place outside the workplace if necessary.
- Seek early advice: Talk to a lawyer experienced in protected disclosures, a union representative, or a Community Law Centre to clarify whether your concern meets the threshold for a protected disclosure and to plan how best to proceed.
- Follow internal procedures where appropriate: If it is safe to do so, use your employer's official reporting channels. Keep records of any reports you make and the responses you receive.
- Consider the right external authority: If internal reporting is not appropriate or has failed, identify which external agency is the right recipient for your disclosure based on the type of wrongdoing.
- Protect yourself: Understand confidentiality obligations, avoid making premature public statements, and be aware of the legal risks. If you start receiving adverse treatment, act quickly to seek legal remedies for reprisals.
- Plan for the practicalities: Whistleblowing can be stressful, especially in smaller communities. Consider support networks, counselling and professional advice to manage the personal and career impacts.
Finally, remember that every situation is different. Early, confidential legal advice will help you understand your options and the protections available in New Zealand law so you can make an informed decision about how to proceed.
