Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Harare, Zimbabwe encompasses mediation and arbitration as primary methods to resolve disputes outside the formal court system. This approach is gaining popularity due to its cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and the ability to produce mutually agreeable outcomes. ADR allows parties to maintain more control over the outcome compared to traditional court proceedings. Mediation involves a neutral third-party mediator assisting the disputing parties to reach a consensus, whereas arbitration involves an arbitrator making decisions after evaluating the evidence and arguments presented by both sides.
Engaging a lawyer for ADR proceedings can be beneficial in several situations including:
Zimbabwe's legal framework for ADR primarily stems from the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15], which outlines the legal proceedings for arbitration. There are no specific statutes for mediation; however, it is broadly supported and facilitated by common law principles. The Act emphasizes fairness, impartiality, and adherence to agreements established through arbitration. Local courts can enforce arbitration awards, providing an additional layer of assurance to parties engaged in ADR.
A mediator facilitates discussion, helping parties to understand each other's perspectives and guiding them toward a mutually acceptable resolution without imposing a decision.
Arbitration is generally less formal, quicker, and more flexible than court litigation. Parties often select an arbitrator with subject matter expertise, unlike in public court proceedings.
Arbitration decisions, or awards, are typically final and binding, with limited grounds for appeal, such as evident arbitrator bias or a breach of the arbitration agreement provisions.
No, ADR is not mandatory but is encouraged as a cost-effective and less adversarial way to resolve disputes.
Mediation duration can vary significantly, often resolving in a single session lasting several hours, while more complex issues might take days or weeks.
Yes, ADR is commonly used in family law for resolving matters like divorce settlements and child custody arrangements.
Yes, parties typically share the costs of the mediator or arbitrator, in addition to meeting any associated legal fees. However, overall, ADR may be less expensive than litigation.
Participation in ADR is voluntary. If one party refuses, the dispute may proceed to formal litigation unless ADR is stipulated in a contract.
Parties usually agree on an arbitrator, often choosing someone with expertise relevant to the dispute. If they can't agree, selection methods are outlined in the arbitration agreement.
Yes, ADR is widely recognized and practiced internationally, with many countries, including Zimbabwe, being parties to treaties like the New York Convention, which facilitates the enforcement of international arbitration awards.
If you require legal assistance in ADR mediation or arbitration, consider the following steps:
