Best Defamation Lawyers in Stonehaven
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
List of the best lawyers in Stonehaven, United Kingdom
We haven't listed any Defamation lawyers in Stonehaven, United Kingdom yet...
But you can share your requirements with us, and we will help you find the right lawyer for your needs in Stonehaven
Find a Lawyer in StonehavenAbout Defamation Law in Stonehaven, United Kingdom
Defamation is the area of law that protects your reputation from false statements that are published to others and cause serious harm. Stonehaven is in Scotland, so Scots law applies. In Scotland, defamation is governed primarily by the Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Act 2021, together with long standing court decisions. Unlike some other parts of the UK, Scots law treats defamation as a single concept whether the words are written, spoken, posted online, or broadcast.
To be defamatory, a statement must be communicated to at least one person other than you, be about you or clearly refer to you, be false or not capable of being justified, and cause serious harm to your reputation. For companies and other bodies that trade for profit, the statement must cause or be likely to cause serious financial loss.
Local cases can be raised in the Sheriff Court that serves Stonehaven residents, typically Aberdeen Sheriff Court, or in the Court of Session in Edinburgh for complex or higher value claims.
Why You May Need a Lawyer
You may need a defamation lawyer if any of the following apply to you in or around Stonehaven.
You have been defamed online, for example in a social media post, a local forum, a review site, or a blog, and you want the content removed quickly, a correction issued, or compensation.
A newspaper, broadcaster, podcast, or community newsletter plans to publish a story about you or your business and you want pre publication advice to reduce legal risk or to seek a right of reply.
You received a solicitor letter alleging you defamed someone and you need to respond, manage risk, assert defences, or settle on fair terms.
You run a business and a competitor or anonymous account has posted false statements that are damaging trade, and you need a rapid takedown and potentially an interdict to prevent further publication.
You are a professional, public figure, or local organisation facing reputational harm and need a strategy that balances legal steps with public relations considerations.
You are a website operator, forum admin, or publisher and have received a complaint or notice about user generated content and need to handle it lawfully to preserve any available defences.
Local Laws Overview
Main statute. The Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Act 2021 modernises Scots defamation law. It introduced a serious harm threshold, updated defences, clarified liability for online intermediaries, and created a single publication rule. It also replaced the old common law delict of malicious falsehood with a new statutory delict of malicious publication for statements that cause financial loss.
Serious harm. A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the person it concerns. For profit trading bodies, serious financial loss must be shown.
Who can sue. Individuals can sue. Companies and some other legal persons can sue if they meet the serious financial loss test. You cannot sue on behalf of someone who has died, and estates cannot bring claims about statements made about the deceased.
Who can be liable. The person who makes or authors the statement can be liable, as can an editor or publisher. The Act gives protections to certain secondary publishers such as internet intermediaries and website operators, particularly if they follow notice and takedown procedures. Liability depends on the role played and the steps taken once notified.
Publication and meaning. The words are assessed in their overall context to determine the ordinary meaning or any innuendo meaning. The court decides meaning. Publication includes speaking in front of others, online posts, emails copied to third parties, and broadcasts.
Defences. Key statutory defences include truth, honest opinion, and publication on a matter of public interest where the publisher reasonably believed that it was in the public interest to publish. There are also privileges, including absolute privilege for things said in Parliament and in court, and qualified privilege for fair and accurate reporting of certain public proceedings. There is a specific protection for peer reviewed academic and scientific statements in certain circumstances.
Remedies. Remedies can include damages, interdicts to prevent further publication, orders to remove online content, and declarations of falsity. Courts can also permit the publication of a summary of the court's judgment.
Time limits. Most Scottish defamation claims must be raised within one year of the date of first publication. Scotland has a single publication rule, so the clock usually runs from the first time the statement was made available to the public, not each click or re publication. The court has limited discretion to allow a late claim in exceptional circumstances. Do not delay seeking advice.
Where cases are heard. Stonehaven residents will usually raise actions in the local Sheriff Court district, commonly Aberdeen Sheriff Court. Higher value or complex defamation cases may proceed in the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Costs and funding. Costs can be significant. Some Scottish firms offer success fee agreements or fixed fee stages. Legal aid for defamation is very limited. Check your home insurance or business policy for legal expenses cover. After the event insurance may be available to manage adverse costs risk.
Alternatives to court. Many disputes resolve through prompt takedown, corrections, rights of reply, mediation, or negotiated statements. Early engagement can limit damage and legal spend.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as defamation in Scotland
A false statement communicated to at least one other person that is about you and causes serious harm to your reputation. For trading companies, the harm must amount to serious financial loss. It can be spoken, written, or online.
Do I need to prove that the publisher intended to harm me
No. Intention is not required for defamation. You must show publication, that the words are defamatory of you, and that serious harm resulted or is likely. Intention and malice may be relevant to the separate delict of malicious publication where financial loss is claimed.
How long do I have to bring a claim
Generally one year from the date of first publication in Scotland, subject to a single publication rule. There is limited judicial discretion to allow late claims in exceptional cases, but you should not rely on that. Act quickly.
Can my business sue for defamation
Yes, if it is a body that trades for profit and it can show serious financial loss caused or likely to be caused by the publication. If the issue is primarily economic and not reputational, a malicious publication claim may be more suitable.
Is it defamation if the statement is true
No. Truth is a complete defence. The burden is on the defender to prove that the imputation conveyed by the words is substantially true.
Are opinions protected
There is a defence of honest opinion if the statement is recognisable as opinion rather than fact, based on true or privileged facts indicated in the publication or otherwise known to the audience, and an honest person could have held the opinion. Simply labelling something as opinion will not protect a statement that implies false facts.
What if the statement was on social media and quickly deleted
It can still be defamatory if it was published to others and caused or was likely to cause serious harm. Deletion helps limit harm and may reduce damages, but it does not erase liability. Early takedown and a suitable correction can be important in managing risk.
Am I liable if I just shared or retweeted someone else's post
Re publication can be actionable in Scotland. Sharing, quoting, or endorsing a defamatory post may expose you to liability because you are communicating the statement to a new audience. Seek advice before amplifying allegations about others.
Can I force an apology or a retraction
Court remedies focus on damages, interdicts, and removal orders. While a court can allow publication of a summary of its judgment, apologies and retractions are typically negotiated. Many disputes resolve with a takedown, clarification, and agreed wording.
What if the author is anonymous or based outside Scotland
Your solicitor can use legal tools to seek disclosure from website operators or platforms to identify anonymous posters, and can consider Scottish jurisdiction if substantial publication occurred here. Cross border issues are complex, so early specialist advice is important.
Additional Resources
Law Society of Scotland Find a Solicitor service to locate solicitors with media and defamation expertise near Stonehaven.
Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service for information about Sheriff Courts and the Court of Session, including Aberdeen Sheriff Court and Justice of the Peace Court.
Citizens Advice Scotland for free, independent guidance on consumer and online issues that may overlap with defamation disputes.
Independent Press Standards Organisation for complaints about most newspapers, magazines, and their websites.
Ofcom for broadcast standards issues that may intersect with defamation in television and radio.
Information Commissioner's Office for data protection rights such as rectification and erasure that may complement defamation remedies in online contexts.
Police Scotland if communications cross into criminal territory such as threats, harassment, or hate crime. Defamation itself is a civil matter.
Next Steps
Preserve evidence. Keep screenshots with timestamps and URLs, save emails, record who saw the statement, and note any financial or personal impacts. Do not alter anything and avoid engaging publicly.
Assess quickly. Consider whether the words are about you, what meaning they convey, and whether serious harm has occurred or is likely. Note the one year time limit from first publication.
Seek specialist advice. Contact a Scottish solicitor experienced in defamation. For Stonehaven residents, look for firms that practice in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire or media law teams that act across Scotland.
Consider early resolution. A well crafted letter of claim or a targeted takedown and correction request can often achieve removal, clarification, and proportionate redress without court.
Plan for costs and risk. Ask about funding options, success fee agreements, insurance, and realistic outcomes. Weigh legal steps against reputational strategy.
Escalate if needed. Where harm is serious and unresolved, your solicitor can raise proceedings in the appropriate Scottish court and seek remedies such as interdicts, removal orders, and damages.
If you are a publisher or website operator, implement a robust notice handling process, document decisions, and seek advice promptly to protect any available statutory defences.
Disclaimer:
The information provided on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, legal information may change over time, and interpretations of the law can vary. You should always consult with a qualified legal professional for advice specific to your situation. We disclaim all liability for actions taken or not taken based on the content of this page. If you believe any information is incorrect or outdated, please contact us, and we will review and update it where appropriate.