Existing user? Sign in
Share your needs with us, get contacted by law firms.
Free. Takes 2 min.
Motor vehicle defect law in San Jose encompasses civil claims arising from design, manufacturing, or marketing defects in cars, trucks, and motorcycles. Plaintiffs may pursue product liability or warranty-based remedies against manufacturers, distributors, or dealers when a defect causes injury or property damage. California law also provides specific lemon law protections for new and certain used vehicles.
Two key legal frameworks frequently come into play in San Jose cases. First, state consumer protection and warranty laws regulate how defects are addressed by sellers and manufacturers. Second, federal safety standards govern how vehicles must perform and which recalls are required. Local courts in Santa Clara County handle civil matters involving motor vehicle defects brought by residents of San Jose and surrounding communities.
Evidence preservation, recall notifications, and timely filings are critical in defect cases. An attorney can help you secure repair records, service histories, and recall notices, which often determine liability and damages. Working with a qualified attorney ensures you understand your rights under both state and federal law throughout the process.
Note: Recall campaigns are administered at the federal level by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which coordinates safety notices and recalls for millions of vehicles nationwide. Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recalls information is available at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
For residents of San Jose, understanding how California law interacts with federal safety standards is essential. Local courts apply California rules of civil procedure, contract, and tort law to defect claims. Attorneys in Santa Clara County bring familiarity with how these rules affect juries, discovery, and settlement strategies. See official resources for recall and warranty information at government websites linked in this guide.
Used-car disclosure failure in a San Jose purchase. You bought a used vehicle from a local dealer with a known defect the seller failed to disclose. After repair bills pile up and the defect reappears, you may need counsel to pursue remedies under California law.
Defect that caused a crash and injures a family member. An airbag inflator recall exists, but the repairs were not completed, or the defect reoccurred during a crash. An attorney can assess product liability and warranty claims against the manufacturer and dealer.
Injury from faulty braking or steering systems in a San Jose vehicle fleet. If your car, or a vehicle you lease or rent, has a known safety defect that contributed to an accident, you may need legal guidance to determine liable parties and recover damages.
Defective tire leading to a multi-vehicle collision. A tire recall and design defect could shift liability to manufacturers or service providers, and an attorney can help establish fault and damages.
Lemon law claim for a new or qualifying vehicle. If a vehicle repeatedly fails to meet warranty standards, you may pursue remedies under California Lemon Law and related warranties.
Documentation gaps or delayed recalls complicating your claim. A lawyer can organize recall records, service histories, and independent expert opinions to support liability and damages.
California law provides several routes to remedies for motor vehicle defects. The most notable is the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commonly known as the California Lemon Law, which offers remedy options for breach of warranty on motor vehicles. California Civil Code sections 1790 et seq. govern these consumer warranty rights.
In addition, the state recognizes implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, which can apply to vehicle purchases from merchants. Civil Code sections 2314 and 2315 describe these implied warranties and any limitations or disclaimers that may apply. These tools help consumers recover when a defect is present at sale or shortly after purchase.
California also uses the Unfair Competition Law to address deceptive or unlawful business practices in the sale and advertising of motor vehicles. Business and Professions Code section 17200 provides a remedy when misrepresentation about vehicle safety or reliability occurs. Federal safety standards, administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, also govern recall obligations and safety requirements across the United States.
Recent trends emphasize recall enforcement and consumer remedies in motor vehicle defect matters. For state-level guidance, see the California Lemon Law resources and consumer protection pages from official agencies. For federal recall information and safety standards, consult the NHTSA resources linked in this guide.
Source references: NHTSA safety standards and recalls information at nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/federal-safety-standards; California Lemon Law and warranty guidance are discussed on California Legislative Information and DMV resources linked below.
A defect claim asserts that a vehicle has a safety or reliability defect that caused harm or worsened a harm. Claims can rely on warranty law, product liability, and sometimes regulatory recalls. An attorney can help identify the applicable theory and remedies.
Begin by confirming the defect is covered under the Song-Beverly Act, the warranty is active, and the defect persists after reasonable repairs. Document repairs, keep receipts, and consult a California attorney to assess the chances of a refund or replacement.
The Song-Beverly Act provides remedies for consumers who purchase or lease new motor vehicles with substantial defects. It applies to dealers and manufacturers and allows refunds, replacements, or cash settlements under certain conditions.
Recovery depends on the claim type. Lemon law claims may recover replacement or refund of the vehicle and certain incidental costs. Product liability claims may include medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering where applicable.
Timelines vary widely. Some pre-trial settlements occur within months, while others stretch over 1-2 years or more if litigation proceeds to trial. Your attorney can provide a realistic calendar based on your case specifics.
While not mandatory, a lawyer improves your chances of a fair settlement or trial outcome. An attorney can assess liability, preserve evidence, and navigate deadlines and fee structures.
Many motor vehicle defect lawyers in California work on a contingency fee basis. You typically pay no attorney fees unless you recover money or a settlement. Confirm fee terms during a consultation.
Yes. California imposes statutes of limitations and deadlines for different claim types. Missing deadlines can bar recovery. An attorney can identify the exact deadlines for your situation.
A recall is a safety intervention ordered by manufacturers and regulatory agencies to fix a defect. A defect claim is a civil action seeking damages or remedies for injuries or losses caused by the defect.
Used car defects may be covered by implied warranties or disclosures from the seller. In some cases, lemon law protections extend to certain qualifying used vehicles. Consult an attorney for a precise evaluation.
Not always. Some claims are better managed through remedies against manufacturers or dealers. An attorney can determine whether to involve insurers and how to coordinate multiple claims.
Recall information is publicly accessible through federal and state channels. Start with the NHTSA recalls database and also check California DMV and manufacturer notices for localized guidance.
